Carbon dating validity

Unfortunately, tree ring dating is itself not entirely reliable, especially the "long chronology" employed to calibrate the carbon dating method.The result is that carbon dating is accurate for only a few thousand years. This fact is born out in how carbon dating results are used by scientists in the scientific literature.Meyer • Teach the controversy • Texas Board of Education • Text of The Wedge Strategy • Text of the Santorum Amendment • Wedge Strategy • Wedgie strategy • What is intelligent design?

Carbon-dating Carbon dating, like other radiometric dating methods, requires certain assumptions that cannot be scientifically proved.

These include the starting conditions, the constancy of the rate of decay, and that no material has left or entered the sample.

Furthermore, if a sample has been contaminated, scientists will know about it.

Ironically, given how supposedly useless carbon dating is claimed to be, Creation Ministries International rests part of their "101 Evidences" on carbon dating being a useful method for within several thousand years.

Carbon dating is somewhat accurate because we are able to determine what the ratio was in the unobservable past to a certain extent.

By taking a carboniferous specimen of known age (that is, a specimen which we are able to date with reasonable certainty through some archaeological means), scientists are able to determine what the ratio was during a specimen's lifetime.Unfortunately, we aren't able to reliably date artifacts beyond several thousand years.Scientists have tried to extend confidence in the carbon dating method further back in time by calibrating the method using tree ring dating.• Evolution and morality • Evolution and religion • Evolution conspiracy • Evolutionism • Firmament • Galactocentricity • Geomagnetism • Global flood • Haji Yearam • Hanzi of Genesis • Historical and operational science • Hydroplate theory • In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood • Intelligent design and academic freedom • Irreducible complexity • Leap second • List of creationist claims • Lunar bukkake hypothesis • Lunar dust • Lunar radioactivity • Lunar transient phenomena • Microevolution and macroevolution • Noah's Ark • Noah's Ark sightings • Orchidaceae • Peanut butter argument • Proof of the inconsistency of arithmetic • Recession of the Moon • Rotation of the Earth • Science doesn't know everything • Science was wrong before • Wedge Strategy • White hole cosmology • Baraminology • Didit fallacy • Epic of Gilgamesh • Flood geology • Fossil sorting by the global flood • Global flood • Global flood chronology • God's Love • Grand Canyon • Haji Yearam • Hydroplate theory • Lake Agassiz • Life and the global flood • Lunar bukkake hypothesis • Noah • Noah's Ark • Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study • Noah's Ark sightings • Noah (film) • Parasites during the global flood • Adam and Evolution: A Scientific Critique of Neo-Darwinism • Appel à la beauté • Argument from beauty • Argument from design • Argument from fine tuning • Argument from first cause • Ask Darwinists • Banana argument • Biological Information: New Perspectives • Cdesign proponentsists • Darwinism Under The Microscope: How Recent Scientific Evidence Points To Divine Design • Evolution Under the Microscope: A Scientific Critique of the Theory of Evolution • Expelled: Leader's Guide • Explanatory Filter • Eye • Falsifiability of creationism • Flagellum • Flowers of asexually-reproducing plants • Intelligent design • Intelligent design and academic freedom • Irreducible complexity • John A.Davison • Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False • Moody Institute of Science • Polonium halos • Providence Lost: A Critique of Darwinism • Rethinking Darwin: A Vedic Study of Darwinism and Intelligent Design • Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design • Suboptimal design • The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin • The End of Darwinism • The Mystery of Life's Origin: Reassessing Current Theories • The Origin of Human Nature: A Zen Buddhist Looks at Evolution • The Wonders of Creation Reveal God's Glory • Thomas Nagel • Academic Freedom Act • Edwards v. In order for carbon dating to be accurate, we must know what the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 was in the environment in which our specimen lived during its lifetime.

344 Comments

  1. In psychology, they call this a “self-fulfilling prophecy”.

Comments are closed.